By George Ward
In line with its ongoing developmental projects, the Cardano network is on the verge of completing another significant upgrade with the imminent transformation of its proof-of-stake (PoS) chain into a governance entity. However, the move depends on the outcome of the CIP-1694, a pivotal plan that holds the power to shape the future of the Cardano network.
Cardano Seeks Support with Incentives
As Cardano sets its sights on becoming the pioneer decentralized blockchain protocol governed and operated by its community, the long-term practicality of CIP-1694 is dependent on its governance contributors. In the next few years, the community will begin to exercise their voting rights to determine its integration.
Cardano is making moves to bolster the persuasive appeal of CIP-1694. First, it seeks to entice voters with attractive incentives to lure them into embracing this ambitious project.
According to Charles Hoskinson, Cardano’s founder, he envisions a future where the network, driven by the completion of CIP-1694, could outperform Bitcoin, Ethereum, and all other crypto platforms in decentralization. Hoskinson’s ambitious vision paints a vivid picture of Cardano emerging as an embodiment of a truly decentralized ecosystem.
CIP-1694 is a groundbreaking initiative within the Cardano community and represents a significant milestone in the platform’s evolution toward unmatched decentralization. Once completed, Cardano aims to redefine the standards and expectations of the cryptocurrency landscape, surpassing the limitations plaguing its competitors.
Furthermore, the network has charted a transformative course for its on-chain governance to enable mass participation in its governance activities. Nevertheless, the existing version of this proposed system is set to address pressing issues like vulnerabilities, manipulation, and spam, which demand critical attention and resolution.
To tackle these challenges head-on, Matthias “KtorZ” Benkort, the technical director of the Cardano Foundation, has proposed a unique solution to nurture an incentivized and decentralized ecosystem. Benkort claims that this proposal will hinder the activities of malicious actors.
This proposal, known as the “KtorZ tax” or the governance action fee, aims to revolutionize the Cardano landscape. Recently, Benkort presented an interim proposal on GitHub by introducing the concept of an optional tax for individuals that submit governance actions.
This novel approach will mandate users to pay a minimum fee as a prerequisite for validating and submitting their proposals on the Cardano network. The platform hopes to achieve many of its objectives by implementing this proposal.
Most importantly, it ensures that proposal creators genuinely support their ideas. Thus, there can be less spam while their suggestions contribute to the ecosystem’s legitimacy.
Will The Governance Action Fee Affect Cardano?
With the implementation of a fee for every governance action, Cardano is set to empower its vibrant community. Thus, they can vote on the incentives governing the behavior of DReps (Decentralized Representatives) who vote on behalf of other ADA holders.
Moreover, this novel approach strengthens the voices of stakeholders and reinforces their commitment to their suggested proposals. Hence, this approach creates a robust ecosystem that effectively filters out spam and safeguards against the infiltration of malicious actors.
By introducing the fee mechanism, Cardano aims to foster a culture of genuine support and engagement within its governance process. It also intends to instill a sense of responsibility and accountability among users.
This move ensures that those who advocate for implementing these proposals have considered the intricate details of such proposals. Consequently, Cardano paves the way for a governance framework that sets a new standard for decentralized systems.
Also, it fosters a dynamic and inclusive ecosystem that thrives on its users’ genuine support and active engagement. Cardano’s introduction of a fee market for governance actions ushers in an ambitious change that redefines the decentralized governance landscape, incentivizes active participation, and enhances the overall effectiveness of the ecosystem.
A side benefit of this pioneering approach is that it creates a dynamic environment where users must prioritize governance actions based on their fundamental value and potential impact.