Blockchain Architecture: Sidechains, Layer-2s, and Appchains Explained

Layer 2 solutions (L2s), sidechains, and appchains are off-chain scaling mechanisms that enhance blockchain networks’ efficacy and usability. Each of these solutions is intended to enhance the efficacy of the underlying blockchain by reducing gas fees and increasing transaction speed and scalability.

Blockchain Sidechains Explained

Sidechains are separate blockchains linked by a two-way bridge to a parent or mainnet. As a result, sidechains are a workable option for improving blockchain scalability by enabling asset transfers between the two blockchains.

Every sidechain has its consensus methods and runs independently. The relationship between the two chains is commonly characterized as “parent-child,” meaning that the child network’s resources depend completely on the parent chain. Some examples of Bitcoin sidechains include Liquid Network and Rootstock. Ethereum sidechains: Alpha, Polygon, and Gnosis Chain

What is Layer-2 (L2) Scaling Solutions?

The foundational crypto blockchain is layer-1 (L1), which guarantees data availability, security, and decentralization. L1 blockchains handle transaction processing and uphold network security by consensus algorithms such as proof-of-work (PoW) or proof-of-stake (PoS).

The L1 blockchains of Ethereum and Bitcoin are well-known examples. On the other hand, a layer-2 (L2) network functions as an additional off-chain blockchain or technology built upon the foundational L1 blockchain.

Enhancing the transaction speed and scalability of the L1 blockchain is the main goal of an L2 system. Notably, smart contracts’ operations are based on Layer-2 solutions.

Layer-2 scaling solutions for Bitcoin: Lightning Network for Bitcoin

Ethereum’s layer-2 protocols: Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism

Types of L2 Scaling Solutions

Rollups

Rollups combine and process several transactions off the main chain, then send them to the mainnet for verification. Optimistic rollups use fraud proofs, while zero-knowledge (ZK) rollups use validity proofs.

Ethereum Plasma Chains

This L2 solution uses Merkle trees and smart contracts to create several child chains replicating the Ethereum main chain and improving scalability.

Validium

Validium solutions store transaction data off-chain and ensure blockchain security through validity proofs. Applications that demand frequent, cost-effective transactions benefit from their great scalability and low transaction costs.

State Channels

With State Channels, users can conduct several transactions off-chain and record the final state on the blockchain. This method decreases main chain congestion and transaction fees without sacrificing security.

What is an Application-specific Blockchain (appchain)?

Unlike general-purpose blockchains that allow several apps for different functions, appchains are tailored to a single business need or use case. Appchains can run independently. However, they usually use layer-1 blockchains.

Appchains use layer-1 blockchains for security and networking. No competition for storage and processing gives appchains more flexibility in governance, consensus procedures, and economic models.

Moreover, appchains promote cross-chain interoperability, security, privacy, transaction processing speed, and volume. Examples of appchains include Cosmos Zones, Polkadot Parachains, and Avalanche Subnets.

Differences between Appchains, Sidechains, and Layer 2s

Security

Layer 2 solutions rely on the mainnet security architecture (Layer 1). Appchains also use public blockchains for security. However, sidechains have their security mechanisms that are independent of the mainnet.

Operational Model

Sidechains

Sidechains are autonomous networks with their consensus protocols. Users can operate mainnet nodes using coin-backing nodes and a public block explorer while a two-way bridge connects sidechains to the mainnet.

Layer 2 (L2) Solutions

These solutions manage scaling and individual transactions outside the main chain using an underlying protocol. While they share the Layer-1 blockchain’s load and can add features, the mainnet controls fund exports. Layer-2 solutions are more integrated with mainnet operations and security than sidechains.

Appchains

Appchains usually provide resources to certain programs and do not compete with others.

Public Members

Sidechains: Sidechains are sovereign blockchains that allow public membership.

Layer-2 Solutions: Depending on their architecture, layer-2 solutions can have public members.

Appchains: Appchains are often closed-off infrastructures that do not allow public membership.

Customization

Sidechains

Sidechains have their own rules and protocols, distinct from the mainnet. This independence allows use case adaptation without disrupting the main chain.

Layer-2 Solutions

Layer-2 solutions are less flexible than sidechains. They depend on the mainnet for operations and security. Therefore, Layer-1 blockchain changes can affect them.

Appchains

Although constructed on Layer-1 blockchains, appchains are highly customizable. They are single-purpose and do not compete for resources. Hence, developers have more control over appchain tokenomics, consensus, and governance.

Benefits

Appchains

Appchains offer autonomy in selecting consensus techniques, whether proof-of-stake (PoS) or proof-of-authority (PoA) and are customized for particular use cases.

Sidechains

This allows testing new features and technologies without interfering with the mainchain, thus promoting growth and creativity.

Layer-2 Solutions

By reducing transaction output, Layer-2 solutions ease the strain on the main chain, lowering transaction fees and enhancing overall scalability.

Conclusion

Sidechains, appchains, and Layer 2 solutions offer different scalability, security, and customization benefits. By understanding their operating models and benefits, developers can choose the best method to improve mainchain’s performance and meet application needs.

George Ward

By George Ward

George Ward is a crypto journalist and market analyst at Herald Sheets, known for his engaging articles on the latest digital currency trends. With a background in finance and journalism, he presents complex topics accessibly. George holds a degree in Business and Finance from the University of Cambridge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *